Wild & Baseless: Calling Out the Selective Dismissal

Matt Walsh labels theories around the attempt on Charlie Kirk's life as "wild and baseless," just like he does with Sandy Hook discussions. He frames it as another case of crazy conspiracies run amok.

Here's my pushback in the Short:

Just like Sandy Hook, Charlie Kirk's assassination attempt has become the subject of wild and baseless conspiracy theories.

Oh, it has also become the subject of calm and based conspiracy theories. Are you going to mention any of those, Matt?

The point is simple: not every alternative explanation is unhinged. Some are measured, grounded in real inconsistencies or unanswered questions. Dismissing the whole category as "wild and baseless" skips over the ones that hold water—or at least deserve a fair look.

I'm not saying every theory is correct. I'm saying blanket rejection ignores nuance. When variables pile up and official accounts leave gaps, people notice. Some chase wild ideas; others stick to calm, evidence-based scrutiny.

That's why I made the video: to highlight the double standard in how these get lumped together. If we're going to talk conspiracies, let's separate the baseless from the based. Matt, got any room in the conversation for the latter?

Hashtags: #mattwalsh #candaceowens #rebuttal #charliekirk